Educational objectives of physics curriculum components: an analysis based on the Revised Bloom's Taxonomy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36661/2595-4520.2026v9n1.15062

Keywords:

Physics Education, Learning Theories, Cognitive Domain.

Abstract

The definition of educational objectives is fundamental in any teaching plan, as it influences learning. The aim of this study was to analyze the educational objectives of Physics curricular components at a Brazilian public university, using the cognitive domain of Bloom’s Taxonomy revised in 2001 along with learning theories and educational neuroscience as theoretical frameworks. The research adopts a qualitative approach, with documentary analysis of a Pedagogical Course Project (PPC) from an undergraduate Physics teacher education program. The educational objectives were categorized according to the levels of the cognitive process dimension (low, medium, and high) and the four levels of the knowledge dimension (factual, conceptual, 

procedural, and metacognitive). The results indicated that the educational objectives are concentrated in the low and medium levels of the cognitive domain (knowledge dimension versus cognitive process dimension). Revising and suggesting new action verbs, as well as analyzing the objectives in light of learning theories, are essential for the development of a curriculum that supports the training of future Physics teachers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Joice Martins Neves

    Licenciada em Física e Mestrado em Ensino do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ensino da Unipampa.

  • Lisete Funari Dias, Unipampa

    Professora Adjunta da Unipampa, do quadro permanente do Programa de Pós- Graduação em Ensino, Licenciada em Física, Mestre em Ensino de física  e doutora em Educação em Ciências.

References

ANDERSON, L. W. et al. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman, 2001.

AUSUBEL, D. Aquisição e retenção de conhecimentos: uma perspectiva cognitiva. Lisboa: Plátano, 2003.

BLOOM, B. S.; ENGELHART, M. D.; FURST, E. J.; HILL, W. H.; KRATHWOHL, D. R. Taxonomia de objetivos educacionais: manual 1 – Domínio cognitivo. Londres: Longmans, Green and Co Ltd, 1956.

IZQUIERDO, I. A.; MYSKIW, J. C.; BENETTI, F.; FURINI, C. R. G. Memória: tipos e mecanismos – achados recentes. Revista USP, São Paulo, n. 98, p. 9–16, out./dez. 2013. DOI: 10.11606/issn.2316-9036.v0i98p9-16. Disponível em: 6 nov. 2024 de: https://revistas.usp.br/revusp/article/view/69221. Acesso em: 02 maio 2023

SEVERINO, A. J. Metodologia do trabalho científico. São Paulo, SP: Cortez, 2017.

TRENTIN, V. B. Transtornos do neurodesenvolvimento. 1. ed. Indaial: Uniasselvi – Pós- Graduação, 2019.

VYGOTSKY, L. S. Pensamento e linguagem. 5. ed. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2007.

WALLON, H. Do ato ao pensamento: ensaio de psicologia comparada. Tradução de Gentil Avelino Titton. Petrópolis, RJ: Editora Vozes, 2010. E-book. Disponível em: https://www.livrosgratis.com.br/ler-livro-online-115761/henri-wallon#google_vignette. Acesso em: 29 jan. 2024

Published

05-02-2026

How to Cite

NEVES, Joice Martins; DIAS, Lisete Funari. Educational objectives of physics curriculum components: an analysis based on the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. Revista Insignare Scientia - RIS, Brasil, v. 9, n. 1, p. e15062, 2026. DOI: 10.36661/2595-4520.2026v9n1.15062. Disponível em: https://periodicos.uffs.edu.br/index.php/RIS/article/view/15062. Acesso em: 6 apr. 2026.