FACTORES FACILITADORES DE LA TRANSICIÓN CIRCULAR DESDE LA PERSPECTIVA DE LOS MICROFUNDAMIENTOS DE LAS CAPACIDADES DINÁMICAS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36661/2596-142X.2026v8n1.15114Palabras clave:
Pesquisa com Especialistas, Framework, Economia circularResumen
Este artículo busca proponer y validar un marco que relaciona las capacidades para la EC, denominadas facilitadores de la transición circular (CHEC), con los microfundamentos de las capacidades dinámicas (MCD) (detección, aprovechamiento y reconfiguración), mostrando cómo estas se forman a partir de factores. La investigación se realizó inicialmente mediante una revisión sistemática de la literatura (SLR) para identificar factores y microfundamentos vinculados a estas capacidades y relacionarlos a partir de un marco teórico inicial. Este marco inicial contenía tres capacidades vinculadas a la detección; cinco a la captación; y cuatro a la reconfiguración; todas con un total de 27 factores relacionados. Posteriormente, mediante la opinión de expertos en un grupo focal, este marco se perfeccionó. Tras el refinamiento, se encontró que el MCD para la detección estaba relacionado con un CHEC (seguimiento del mercado); el de la captación, con cinco (planificación y gestión; aprendizaje y absorción; colaboración; tecnología e innovación); y para la reconfiguración, seis (institucional; capacidad R+; flexibilidad y reestructuración; cadena de suministro; diseño circular); y, de los 27 factores, estos se redujeron a 24, y algunos se excluyeron, adaptaron o crearon según la opinión de los expertos. Como contribución, cabe destacar el refinamiento de la estructura teórica con base en la perspectiva de los expertos, lo que permitió verificar la relación entre las capacidades, algo que no se había identificado en la literatura analizada.
Descargas
Referencias
AGRAWAL, S.; JAIN, V. K.; VERMA, H. Navigating the circular transition: the pivotal role of dynamic capabilities in enabling circular business models and firm performance. Circular Economy and Sustainability, v. 5, p. 751–775, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-024-00451-w
AMUI, L. B. L.; JABBOUR, C. J. C.; JABBOUR, A. B. L. S.; et al. Sustainability as a dynamic organizational capability: a systematic review and a future agenda toward a sustainable transition. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 142, n. 1, p. 308–322, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.103
BELHADI, A.; KAMBLE, S.; CHAIR, O.; et al. Building supply chain resilience and efficiency through additive manufacturing: an ambidextrous perspective on the dynamic capability view. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 249, p. 108516, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108516
BEZERRA, M. C. C.; GOHR, C. F.; MORIOKA, S. N. Organizational capabilities towards corporate sustainability benefits: a systematic literature review and an integrative framework proposal. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 247, p. 119114, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119114
BOCKEN, N. M. P.; GERADTS, T. Barriers and drivers to sustainable business model innovation: organization design and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, v. 53, n. 4, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.101950
BOCKEN, N. M. P.; KONIETZKO, J. Circular business model innovation in consumer-facing corporations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 185, p. 122076, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122076
BOCKEN, N. M. P.; SHORT, S. W.; RANA, P.; EVANS, S. A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 65, p. 42–56, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039
BOONS, F.; LÜDEKE-FREUND, F. Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 45, p. 9–19, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007
CHARI, A.; NIEDENZU, D.; DESPEISSE, M.; et al. Dynamic capabilities for circular manufacturing supply chains: exploring the role of Industry 4.0 and resilience. Business Strategy and the Environment, v. 31, n. 5, p. 2500–2517, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3040
CORREGGI, C.; DI TOMA, P.; GHINOI, S. Rethinking dynamic capabilities in light of sustainability: a bibliometric analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, v. 33, n. 8, p. 7990–8016, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3901
DURACH, C. F.; KEMBRO, J.; WIELAND, A. A new paradigm for systematic literature reviews in supply chain management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, v. 53, n. 4, p. 67–85, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12145
ELO, S.; KYNGÄS, H. The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, v. 62, n. 1, p. 107–115, 2008. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18352969. Acesso em: 4 jun. 2025.
ESPOSITO, M.; TSE, T.; SOUFANI, K. Introducing a circular economy: new thinking with new managerial and policy implications. California Management Review, v. 60, n. 3, p. 5–19, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/000812561876469
FABRIZIO, C. M.; KACZAM, F.; MOURA, G. L.; et al. Competitive advantage and dynamic capability in small and medium-sized enterprises: a systematic literature review and future research directions. Review of Managerial Science, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-021-00459-8
FACCIN, K.; BITENCOURT, C. C.; BATTISTI, E.; et al. Promoting sustainable business model innovation: a dynamic capabilities approach. Management Decision, p. 1–28, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2024-1548
FRISHAMMAR, J.; PARIDA, V. Circular business model transformation: a roadmap for incumbent firms. California Management Review, v. 61, n. 2, p. 5–29, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125618811926
GEISSDOERFER, M.; PIERONI, M. P. P.; PIGOSSO, D. C. A.; SOUFANI, K. Circular business models: a review. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 277, p. 123741, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123741
GEISSDOERFER, M.; VLADIMIROVA, D.; EVANS, S. Sustainable business model innovation: a review. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 198, p. 401–416, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.240
GHISELLINI, P.; CIALANI, C.; ULGIATI, S. A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 114, p. 11–32, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007
GIOIA, D. A.; CORLEY, K. G.; HAMILTON, A. L. Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, v. 16, n. 1, p. 15–31, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
HURLEY, E.; DIETRICH, T.; RUNDLE-THIELE, S. Integrating theory in co-design: an abductive approach. Australasian Marketing Journal, v. 29, n. 1, p. 66–77, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/1839334921998541
KALMYKOVA, Y.; SADAGOPAN, M.; ROSADO, L. Circular economy: from review of theories and practices to development of implementation tools. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, v. 135, p. 190–201, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005
KENDALL, G.; LINACRE, S. Predatory journals: revisiting Beall’s research. Publishing Research Quarterly, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-022-09888-z
KHAN, O.; DADDI, T.; IRALDO, F. Microfoundations of dynamic capabilities: insights from circular economy business cases. Business Strategy and the Environment, v. 29, n. 3, p. 1479–1493, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2447
KIRCHHERR, J.; REIKE, D.; HEKKERT, M. Conceptualizing the circular economy: an analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, v. 127, p. 221–232, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005
LEEMANN, N.; KANBACH, D. K. Toward a taxonomy of dynamic capabilities: a systematic literature review. Management Research Review, v. 45, n. 4, p. 486–501, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-01-2021-0066
MELO, J. L. N.; BEZERRA, M. C. C.; GOHR, C. F. Análise das relações entre clusters e economia circular pela lente das capacidades estratégicas: uma revisão sistemática da literatura e proposta de agenda de pesquisa. In: ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE ENGENHARIA DE PRODUÇÃO, 43., 2023, Fortaleza. Anais. Fortaleza: ABEPRO, 2023.
MINBASHRAZGAH, M.; SHABANI, A. Eco-capability role in healthcare facility’s performance: natural-resource-based view and dynamic capabilities paradigm. Management of Environmental Quality, v. 30, n. 1, p. 137–156, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-07-2017-0073
MOUSAVI, S.; BOSSINK, B.; VAN VLIET, M. Dynamic capabilities and organizational routines for managing innovation towards sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 203, p. 224–239, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.215
NERI, A.; ZANELLA, G.; CAVALCANTE, I.; et al. What digital-enabled dynamic capabilities support the circular economy? a multiple case study approach. Business Strategy and the Environment, v. 32, n. 7, p. 5083–5101, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3409
OLIVEIRA-DIAS, D.; FERREIRA, J.; SILVA, M.; et al. Fostering business model innovation for sustainability: a dynamic capabilities perspective. Management Decision, v. 60, n. 13, p. 105–129, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2021-0590
OPFERKUCH, K.; FREUDENREICH, B.; SCHALTEGGER, S.; et al. Towards a framework for corporate disclosure of circular economy: company perspectives and recommendations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2497
PIERONI, M. P. P.; MCALOONE, T. C.; PIGOSSO, D. C. A. Business model innovation for circular economy and sustainability: a review of approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 215, p. 198–216, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.036
RITZÉN, S.; SANDSTRÖM, G. Ö. Barriers to the circular economy: integration of perspectives and domains. Procedia CIRP, v. 64, p. 7–12, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.005
SAARI, U. A.; MANNINEN, K.; KALLIOKOSKI, P.; et al. Capabilities for circular economy innovation: factors leading to product/service innovations in the construction and manufacturing industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 434, p. 140295, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.140295
SAIDANI, M.; YUE, L.; OKUDA, T.; et al. A taxonomy of circular economy indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 207, p. 542–559, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.014
SALIM, N.; AB RAHMAN, M. N.; ABD WAHAB, D. A systematic literature review of internal capabilities for enhancing eco-innovation performance of manufacturing firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 209, p. 1445–1460, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.105
SANTA-MARIA, T.; VERMEULEN, W. J. V.; BAUMGARTNER, R. J. How do incumbent firms innovate their business models for the circular economy? identifying micro-foundations of dynamic capabilities. Business Strategy and the Environment, v. 31, n. 4, p. 1308–1333, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2956
SAUER, P. C.; SEURING, S. How to conduct systematic literature reviews in management research: a guide in 6 steps and 14 decisions. Review of Managerial Science, v. 17, p. 1899–1933, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00668-3
SCARPELLINI, S.; BAJNSKY, E.; DÍEZ-MARTÍN, F.; et al. Dynamic capabilities and environmental accounting for the circular economy in businesses. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, v. 11, n. 7, p. 1129–1158, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-04-2019-0150
SEHNEM, S.; NASCIMENTO, D.; PEREIRA, S.; et al. Circular economy and innovation: a look from the perspective of organizational capabilities. Business Strategy and the Environment, v. 31, n. 1, p. 236–250, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2884
SELES, B. M. R. P.; NAKAMURA, L. R.; LIMA, M.; et al. Smoothing the circular economy transition: the role of resources and capabilities enablers. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2985
SILVA, I. M. M.; GOHR, C. F. Atividades de inovação orientadas para a sustentabilidade pela ótica das capacidades dinâmicas: um estudo em projetos de uma empresa que atua no setor elétrico. Revista Gestão & Sustentabilidade, v. 6, n. 1, p. 1–25, 2024.
SILVA;, J. S. da; GOHR, C. F. A framework integrating dynamic capabilities with sustainability-oriented innovation activities in collaborative networks: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Innovation, v. 13, n. 1, p. 1–55, 2025.
TEECE, D. J. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, v. 28, n. 13, p. 1319–1350, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
TEECE, D. J.; PISANO, G.; SHUEN, A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, v. 18, p. 509–533, 1997.
TRANFIELD, D.; DENYER, D.; SMART, P. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, v. 14, n. 3, p. 207–222, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
URBINATI, A.; CHIARONI, D.; CHIESA, V. Towards a new taxonomy of circular economy business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 168, p. 487–498, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.047
WYSOKIŃSKA, Z. The “new” environmental policy of the European Union: a path to development of a circular economy and mitigation of the negative effects of climate change. Comparative Economic Research, v. 19, n. 2, p. 57–73, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1515/cer-2016-0013
XIAO, Y.; WATSON, M. Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, v. 39, n. 1, p. 93–112, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Keren Karolyne Nóbrega Silva, Cláudia Fabiana Gohr, Luciano Costa Santos
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
-
O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do artigo na revista;
-
O(s) autor(es) atesta (m) que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);
-
A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, ideias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);
-
É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder ajustes textuais e de adequação do artigo às normas da publicação;
-
Autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Não Adaptada, que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista
