Phosphorus removal in membrane bioreactor systems: a systematic review of operational parameters and configurations

Autores

  • Renata de Arcega Leal Departamento de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 88040-900, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2231-6195
  • Amanda Dalalibera Departamento de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 88040-900, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5671-0034
  • André Aguiar Battistelli Departamento de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 88040-900, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4951-3272
  • Tiago José Belli Departamento de Engenharia Civil, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, 89140-000, Ibirama, SC, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8902-4743
  • Maria Eliza Nagel-Hassemer Departamento de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 88040-900, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7732-7218
  • Gabriel Tochetto Departamento de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 88040-900, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1656-505X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36661/2596-142X.2026v8n1.15643

Palavras-chave:

Nutrient recovery, Biological degradation, Scientometric analysis, Sustainability, Wastewater treatment

Resumo

Phosphorus (P) is an essential yet finite resource, and concerns about its availability are intensified by population growth, urbanization, and increasing food demand, while stringent discharge regulations are required to protect aquatic ecosystems from eutrophication. Membrane bioreactors (MBRs) combine biological treatment with membrane separation, enabling high effluent quality and supporting water reuse; however, the literature reports P performance in ways that are difficult to compare across studies. This systematic review screened 854 Scopus records (2014–2025) and synthesized 29 eligible bench- and pilot-scale studies reporting at least one operational parameter (transmembrane pressure (TMP), hydraulic retention time (HRT), sludge retention time (SRT), or aeration) alongside P performance. Its novelty lies in linking operational settings to performance separately for each P fraction, distinguishing true dissolved-P removal from particulate retention by the membrane, a distinction rarely made in earlier reviews. High total phosphorus (TP) removals (>90%) were frequently reported under optimized or hybrid conditions, including electro-assisted configurations such as electrocoagulation, whereas conventional aerobic MBRs showed more variable orthophosphate removal. Operational settings that improve biological uptake or promote precipitation enhanced P removal but also intensified fouling, revealing a consistent trade-off between effluent quality and membrane service life. The evidence supports MBR-based systems as a versatile platform for meeting stringent P targets, provided that P fractions are reported explicitly and that removal mechanisms are separated from solids retention.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Biografia do Autor

  • Renata de Arcega Leal, Departamento de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 88040-900, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil

    Engenheira Sanitarista e Ambiental (UFSC)

  • Amanda Dalalibera, Departamento de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 88040-900, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil

    Engenheira Ambiental e Sanitarista (2019) formada pela Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC/CAV) e mestre em Engenharia Ambiental (2022) pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC). Atualmente, sou doutoranda no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Ambiental (PPGEA) e membro do Laboratório de Reúso de Águas (LaRA/UFSC). Atuo na área de tratamento de efluentes, com ênfase em efluentes têxteis, integrando processos biológicos e eletroquímicos, especialmente em eletrobiorreatores a membrana, com foco no reúso de água.

  • André Aguiar Battistelli, Departamento de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 88040-900, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil

    Possui graduação em Engenharia Ambiental pela Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste do Paraná, Doutorado em Engenharia Ambiental pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, para o qual foi aprovado por meio de transferência direta do mestrado, e Pós-doutorado na mesma instituição. Também concluiu cursos de Especialização em Engenharia de Segurança do Trabalho, Docência no Ensino Superior e Auditoria e Perícia Ambiental. Atualmente é professor assistente do Departamento de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina e supervisor do Laboratório de Reúso de Águas (LaRA). Atuou como pesquisador visitante na Universitat de Girona (UdG), na Espanha, no contexto de um projeto de cooperação internacional do CNPq, na modalidade de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico e Inovação no Exterior Sênior (DES). Desenvolve pesquisas na área de saneamento ambiental, com ênfase na aplicação de tecnologias inovadoras e sustentáveis para o tratamento de efluentes sanitários e industriais, recuperação de recursos e promoção da economia circular.

  • Tiago José Belli, Departamento de Engenharia Civil, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, 89140-000, Ibirama, SC, Brasil

    Possui graduação em Engenharia Ambiental (2007) pela Universidade Estadual do Centro Oeste-PR. Mestrado (2011), doutorado (2015) e pós-doutorado (2016) em Engenharia Ambiental pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Atualmente é professor associado nível 5 do departamento de Engenharia Civil da Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC), onde leciona disciplinas vinculadas ao tratamento de águas residuárias. Atualmente (2025-2026), exerce a função de chefe de departamento do curso de Engenharia Civil da UDESC/Alto Vale. Atua como professor permanente no Programa de Pós-graduação em Engenharia Civil (PPGEC/CCT) da Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC), orientando alunos de mestrado e doutorado na linha de pesquisa em Recursos Hídricos e Saneamento Ambiental. É revisor de periódicos nacionais e internacionais. Desenvolve pesquisa nas seguintes temáticas: tratamento de águas residuárias; biorreator à membrana (BRM); Eletro-biorreator à membrana (EBRM); reatores híbridos; tratamento de efluente industrial.

  • Maria Eliza Nagel-Hassemer, Departamento de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 88040-900, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil

    Professora Associada do Departamento de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC). Possui graduação em Engenharia Sanitária pela UFSC (1983), mestrado em Engenharia Ambiental pela UFSC (2000) e doutorado em Engenharia Ambiental pela UFSC (2006), com parte realizada na Universidade do Minho, Portugal, além de pós-doutorados pela UFSC (2008 e 2012). Tem experiência na área de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, com ênfase em técnicas convencionais e avançadas de tratamento de água e de efluentes domésticos e industriais, no controle e tratamento de efluentes líquidos e gasosos, na avaliação da qualidade do ar e gases poluentes, bem como na gestão ambiental, com foco em Produção Mais Limpa e sustentabilidade ambiental. Integra a liderança do Grupo de Estudos em Saneamento Descentralizado (GESAD) e o grupo de pesquisadores do LABEFLU Laboratório de Efluentes Líquidos e Gasosos. Atua como supervisora do LaRA Laboratório de Reuso de Águas (UFSC/ENS) e coordenadora do NEAmb Núcleo de Educação Ambiental do Centro Tecnológico da UFSC. Foi tutora da Empresa Júnior de Consultoria Sanitária e Ambiental (EJESAM) do curso de Graduação em Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental da UFSC (ago. 2021 ago. 2023). Atuou como supervisora do LIMA Laboratório Integrado de Meio Ambiente do Departamento de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental (abr. 2015 abr. 2019), Subcoordenadora (dez. 2014 nov. 2016) e Coordenadora (dez. 2016 maio 2021) do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Ambiental (PPGEA/UFSC), Coordenadora do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Ambiental Mestrado Profissional (nov. 2021 nov. 2023) e Coordenadora do subprojeto Pesquisa e Inovação para Cidades Inteligentes e Ambientalmente Sustentáveis Águas, Resíduos e Energia Renovável, vinculado ao Projeto Institucional de Internacionalização PRINT (CAPES Edital n 41/2017), no período de nov. 2018 a out. 2024.

  • Gabriel Tochetto, Departamento de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 88040-900, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil

    Possui graduação em Engenharia Ambiental e Sanitária pela Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul (UFFS/2020) e mestrado em Engenharia Química pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC/2023). Doutorando no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Ambiental pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC/2027) e PhD student no Program of Industrial Engineering (Materials Engineering curricula) na Università degli Studi di Padova (UNIPD/2027). Tem interesse em pesquisas na área de tratamento de águas de abastecimento e residuárias e no desenvolvimento de novos materiais, incluindo impressão 3D, com aplicações na área ambiental.

Referências

ALIBARDI, L.; VALE, P.; BAJÓN FERNÁNDEZ, Y. Full-scale trials to achieve low total phosphorus in effluents from sewage treatment works. Journal of Water Process Engineering, vol. 40, p. 101981, 2021. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214714421000684.

ANDRADE, L. H. de et al. Internal versus external submerged membrane bioreactor configurations for dairy wastewater treatment. Desalination and Water Treatment, vol. 52, no 16–18, p. 2920–2932, 2014. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1944398624061046.

ANDRÉS, E. et al. Phosphate removal using zeolite in treatment wetlands under different oxidation-reduction potentials. Ecological Engineering, vol. 117, p. 18–27, 2018. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0925857418300855.

ASIF, M. B. et al. Understanding the role of in-situ ozonation in Fe(II)-dosed membrane bioreactor (MBR) for membrane fouling mitigation. Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 633, p. 119400, 2021. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0376738821003483.

BACCHIN, P.; AIMAR, P.; FIELD, R. Critical and sustainable fluxes: Theory, experiments and applications. Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 281, no 1–2, p. 42–69, 2006. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S037673880600250X.

BATTISTELLI, A. A. et al. Effect of Hydraulic Retention Time on Treatment Performance in an Anoxic/Oxic Electro-Membrane Bioreactor. Journal of Environmental Engineering, vol. 144, no 11, 2018. Available at: https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29EE.1943-7870.0001455.

BELLI, T. J. et al. Effects of solid retention time and exposure mode to electric current on Remazol Brilliant Violet removal in an electro-membrane bioreactor. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 30, no 20, p. 58412–58427, 2023. Available at: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11356-023-26593-2.

BELLI, T. J. et al. Evaluating the effect of air flow rate on hybrid and conventional membrane bioreactors: Implications on performance, microbial activity and membrane fouling. Science of The Total Environment, vol. 755, p. 142563, 2021. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0048969720360927.

CARRILLO, V. et al. Characterization and recovery of phosphorus from wastewater by combined technologies. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, vol. 19, no 2, p. 389–418, 2020. Available at: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11157-020-09533-1.

CHEN, L. et al. Investigation of filtration performance and phosphorus removal in an electric field controlled dynamic membrane bioreactor. Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 478, p. 147328, 2023. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S138589472306059X.

CHEN, Y.-T. et al. Tailored Surface Porosity of Polyethylene-Based Co-continuous Structures for Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor Carriers. ACS Applied Polymer Materials, vol. 2, no 8, p. 3226–3233, 2020. Available at: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsapm.0c00380.

CHO, Y.-H. et al. Effect of organic loading on the performance of MBR for advanced treatment and water reuse. Desalination and Water Treatment, vol. 33, no 1–3, p. 224–230, 2011. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1944398624198670.

COSTA, R. E. et al. Assessing the performance and microbial community of hybrid moving bed and conventional membrane bioreactors treating municipal wastewater. Environmental Technology, vol. 40, no 6, p. 716–729, 2019. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09593330.2017.1404137.

DA COSTA, R. E. et al. Comparative study on treatment performance, membrane fouling, and microbial community profile between conventional and hybrid sequencing batch membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 25, no 32, p. 32767–32782, 2018. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11356-018-3248-8.

DIAZ, R. et al. Enhanced Bio-P removal: Past, present, and future – A comprehensive review. Chemosphere, vol. 309, p. 136518, 2022. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0045653522030119.

FARIA, O. L. V. et al. Remoção de fósforo de efluentes da parboilização de arroz por absorção biológica estimulada em reator em batelada sequencial (RBS). Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, vol. 26, no 2, p. 309–317, 2006. Available at: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612006000200013&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=pt.

GUO, G. et al. Long term operation performance and membrane fouling mechanisms of anaerobic membrane bioreactor treating waste activated sludge at high solid concentration and high flux. Science of The Total Environment, vol. 846, p. 157435, 2022. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0048969722045338.

HAN, S.-S. et al. Influence of sludge retention time on membrane fouling and bioactivities in membrane bioreactor system. Process Biochemistry, vol. 40, no 7, p. 2393–2400, 2005. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0032959204004042.

HE, Y. et al. Emerging electro-driven technologies for phosphorus enrichment and recovery from wastewater: A review. Water Research, vol. 246, p. 120699, 2023. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0043135423011399.

IORHEMEN, O. T. et al. Simultaneous organics and nutrients removal in side-stream aerobic granular sludge membrane bioreactor (AGMBR). Journal of Water Process Engineering, vol. 21, p. 127–132, 2018. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214714417305056.

JIANG, L. et al. Evaluation of nutrient removal performance and resource recovery potential of anaerobic/anoxic/aerobic membrane bioreactor with limited aeration. Bioresource Technology, vol. 340, p. 125728, 2021. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0960852421010695.

JIN, X. et al. Recent advances in the removal and recovery of phosphorus from aqueous solution by metal-based adsorbents: A review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 204, p. 107464, 2024. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0921344924000582.

JUDD, S. J. The status of industrial and municipal effluent treatment with membrane bioreactor technology. Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 305, p. 37–45, 2016. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1385894715012346.

JUDD, S. The status of membrane bioreactor technology. Trends in Biotechnology, vol. 26, no 2, p. 109–116, 2008. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167779907003216.

KHAN, S. J. et al. Evaluation of treatment performance of a full-scale membrane bioreactor (MBR) plant from unsteady to steady state condition. Journal of Water Process Engineering, vol. 30, p. 100379, 2019. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214714416306444.

KHAN, S. J. et al. Membrane fouling and performance evaluation of conventional membrane bioreactor (MBR), moving biofilm MBR and oxic/anoxic MBR. Water Science and Technology, vol. 69, no 7, p. 1403–1409, 2014. Available at: https://iwaponline.com/wst/article/69/7/1403/18069/Membrane-fouling-and-performance-evaluation-of.

KIM, T. et al. Simultaneous enhancement of nitrogen removal and energy efficiency in a pilot-scale membrane bioreactor via hybrid jet venturi mixer and automatic influent carbon split injection. Journal of Water Process Engineering, v. 91, p. 110549, 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2026.110549. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2026.110549. Acesso em: 4 ago. 2026.

KIM, Y. et al. Dissolved air flotation separation for pretreatment of membrane bioreactor in domestic wastewater treatment. Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology-Aqua, vol. 64, no 2, p. 186–193, 2015. Available at: https://iwaponline.com/aqua/article/64/2/186/29263/Dissolved-air-flotation-separation-for.

KRAUME, M. et al. Fouling in MBR: What use are lab investigations for full scale operation?. Desalination, vol. 236, no 1–3, p. 94–103, 2009. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0011916408006310.

LE-CLECH, P.; CHEN, V.; FANE, T. A. G. Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment. Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 284, no 1–2, p. 17–53, 2006. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0376738806005679.

LEE, H. et al. The 4-stage anoxic membrane bioreactor for simultaneous nitrogen and phosphorus removal, and its strengths and weaknesses. Desalination and Water Treatment, vol. 54, no 13, p. 3616–3624, 2015. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1944398624067924.

LEE, E.-J.; AN, A. K.; KIM, H.-S. Effects of Coagulant with Different Basicity on Membrane-based Biological Treatment for Removing Phosphorus. Journal of Coastal Research, vol. 79, p. 65–69, 2017. Available at: http://www.bioone.org/doi/10.2112/SI79-014.1.

LENS, P. et al. Water Recycling and Resource Recovery in Industry: Analysis, Technologies and Implementation. Water Intelligence Online, vol. 4, p. 9781780402802–9781780402802, 2015. Available at: https://iwaponline.com/ebooks/book/143/.

LI, R.; WANG, X.; LI, X. A membrane bioreactor with iron dosing and acidogenic co-fermentation for enhanced phosphorus removal and recovery in wastewater treatment. Water Research, vol. 129, p. 402–412, 2018. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S004313541730951X.

LI, W. et al. Performance and microbial community dynamics of an internal circulating photogranular membrane bioreactor for synthetic mariculture wastewater treatment under different hydraulic retention times. Environmental Research, v. 305, p. 124972, 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2026.124972. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2026.124972. Acesso em: 4 ago. 2026.

LIN, H.; WANG, Y.; DONG, Y. A review of methods, influencing factors and mechanisms for phosphorus recovery from sewage and sludge from municipal wastewater treatment plants. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, vol. 12, no 1, p. 111657, 2024. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2213343723023965.

LIU, Q. et al. Distribution characteristics of phosphorus-containing substances in a long running aerobic granular sludge-membrane bioreactor with no sludge discharge. Bioresource Technology, vol. 347, p. 126694, 2022. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0960852422000232.

LIU, J. et al. Effect of electrocoagulation on MBR under different power supply conditions. Biochemical Engineering Journal, vol. 152, p. 107371, 2019. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1369703X19303109.

LIU, H. Y. et al. Stable operation of MBR under high permeate flux. Water Practice and Technology, vol. 7, no 4, 2012. Available at: https://iwaponline.com/wpt/article/doi/10.2166/wpt.2012.062/30839/Stable-operation-of-MBR-under-high-permeate-flux.

LIU, W. et al. Strategies to enhance micropollutant removal from wastewater by membrane bioreactors: Recent advances and future perspectives. Bioresource Technology, vol. 344, p. 126322, 2022. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0960852421016643.

MANNINA, G. et al. The effect of the solids and hydraulic retention time on moving bed membrane bioreactor performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 170, p. 1305–1315, 2018. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0959652617322023.

MARGUTI, A. L.; FERREIRA FILHO, S. S.; PIVELI, R. P. Otimização de processos físico-químicos na remoção de fósforo de esgotos sanitários por processos de precipitação química com cloreto férrico. Engenharia Sanitaria e Ambiental, vol. 13, no 4, p. 395–404, 2008. Available at: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-41522008000400008&lng=pt&tlng=pt.

MEHTA, C. M. et al. Technologies to Recover Nutrients from Waste Streams: A Critical Review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 45, no 4, p. 385–427, 2015. Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10643389.2013.866621.

MENG, F. et al. Fouling in membrane bioreactors: An updated review. Water Research, vol. 114, p. 151–180, 2017. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0043135417300817.

METCALF & EDDY. Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse. 4th ed. [S. l.]: McGrwan-Hill, 2003-. ISSN 0884-2175.

NA, J.-H. et al. Reduced sludge production in a membrane bioreactor by uncoupling metabolism and its effect on phosphorus accumulation in the biomass. Environmental Technology, vol. 38, no 23, p. 3007–3015, 2017. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09593330.2017.1285964.

NGUYEN, T.-M.-P. et al. Enhanced nutrient removal and microbial stability in a hybrid membrane bioreactor driven by Chlorella sorokiniana-Bacteria synergism. Journal of Water Process Engineering, v. 84, p. 109748, 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2026.109748. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2026.109748. Acesso em: 4 ago. 2026.

PAGOTTO, R. et al. SANASA Capivari II – the first full-scale municipal membrane bioreactor in Latin America. Water Science and Technology, vol. 70, no 2, p. 272–278, 2014. Available at: https://iwaponline.com/wst/article/70/2/272/18464/SANASA-Capivari-II-the-first-fullscale-municipal.

PALMARIN, M. J.; YOUNG, S. Comparison of the treatment performance of a hybrid and conventional membrane bioreactor for greywater reclamation. Journal of Water Process Engineering, vol. 28, p. 54–59, 2019. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214714418304768.

POLLICE, A.; LAERA, G.; BLONDA, M. Biomass growth and activity in a membrane bioreactor with complete sludge retention. Water Research, vol. 38, no 7, p. 1799–1808, 2004. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0043135404000338.

PREDOLIN, L. M. et al. Effect of current density on the efficiency of a membrane electro-bioreactor for removal of micropollutants and phosphorus, and reduction of fouling: A pilot plant case study. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, vol. 9, no 1, p. 104874, 2021. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2213343720312239.

RATANATAMSKUL, C.; CHAROENPHOL, C.; YAMAMOTO, K. Development of the anaerobic baffled reactor-membrane bioreactor (ABR-MBR) as a biological nutrient removal system for high-rise building wastewater recycling. Desalination and Water Treatment, vol. 54, no 4–5, p. 908–915, 2015. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1944398624064944.

RATANATAMSKUL, C.; ROMSKUL, T. Effect of horizontal-flow velocity on permeate flux and nutrient removal of the novel inclined-tube/oxidation-ditch membrane bioreactor for building wastewater recycling. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, vol. 188, p. 823–830, 2022. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0263876222005998.

RAVADELLI, M. et al. Anoxic/oxic membrane bioreactor assisted by electrocoagulation for the treatment of azo-dye containing wastewater. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, vol. 9, no 4, p. 105286, 2021. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2213343721002633.

SAYI-UCAR, N. et al. Long-term study on the impact of temperature on enhanced biological phosphorus and nitrogen removal in membrane bioreactor. Water Research, vol. 84, p. 8–17, 2015. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0043135415300890.

SILVA, M. V. et al. Pós-tratamento de efluente de biorreator com membranas submersas por coagulação/floculação: remoção de cor, matéria orgânica e fósforo. Engenharia Sanitaria e Ambiental, vol. 27, no 3, p. 553–560, 2022. Available at: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-41522022000300553&tlng=pt.

SMITH, S. et al. Improving biological phosphorus removal in membrane bioreactors – a pilot study. Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination, vol. 4, no 1, p. 25–33, 2014. Available at: https://iwaponline.com/jwrd/article/4/1/25/28716/Improving-biological-phosphorus-removal-in.

SORGATO, A. C. et al. A comprehensive review of nitrogen removal in an electro-membrane bioreactor (EMBR) for sustainable wastewater treatment. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 20, no 8, p. 9225–9248, 2023. Available at: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13762-022-04717-4.

SOUZA, E. et al. Membrane fouling suppression using intermittent electric current with low exposure time in a sequencing batch membrane bioreactor. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, vol. 8, no 4, p. 104018, 2020. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2213343720303663.

SUN, G. et al. Effect of chemical dose on phosphorus removal and membrane fouling control in a UCT-MBR. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, vol. 13, no 1, p. 1, 2019. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11783-019-1085-8.

THOMAS, H.; JUDD, S.; MURRER, J. Fouling characteristics of membrane filtration in membrane bioreactors. Membrane Technology, vol. 2000, no 122, p. 10–13, 2000. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0958211800889594.

UDOMKITTAYACHAI, N. et al. Electroconductive moving bed membrane bioreactor (EcMB-MBR) for single-step decentralized wastewater treatment: Performance, mechanisms, and cost. Water Research, vol. 188, p. 116547, 2021. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0043135420310824.

VAN VUUREN, D. P.; BOUWMAN, A. F.; BEUSEN, A. H. W. Phosphorus demand for the 1970–2100 period: A scenario analysis of resource depletion. Global Environmental Change, vol. 20, no 3, p. 428–439, 2010. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0959378010000312.

VON SPERLING, M. Wastewater Characteristics, Treatment and Disposal. Water Intelligence Online, vol. 6, p. 9781780402086–9781780402086, 2015. Available at: https://iwaponline.com/ebooks/book/72/.

WANG, Y.-K. et al. Simultaneous effective carbon and nitrogen removals and phosphorus recovery in an intermittently aerated membrane bioreactor integrated system. Scientific Reports, vol. 5, no 1, p. 16281, 2015. Available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/srep16281.

WU, B. et al. Micro-granular sludge driven by powder carrier in membrane bioreactor: highly-efficient N & P removal and membrane fouling alleviation. Water Research, v. 288, p. 124635, 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2025.124635. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2025.124635. Acesso em: 4 ago. 2026.

WU, P. et al. Mechanism of efficient nutrient removal and microbial analysis of a combined anaerobic baffled reactor–membrane bioreactor process. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 11, no 6, p. 1611–1618, 2014. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13762-013-0347-4.

YAQUB, M.; LEE, W. Modeling nutrient removal by membrane bioreactor at a sewage treatment plant using machine learning models. Journal of Water Process Engineering, v. 46, p. 102521, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102521. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102521. Acesso em: 4 ago. 2026.

YEON, K.-M. et al. Membrane coupled high-performance compact reactor: A new MBR system for advanced wastewater treatment. Water Research, vol. 39, no 10, p. 1954–1961, 2005. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0043135405000989.

YU, B. et al. Low-maintenance anti-fouling and phosphorus removal of an electro-MBR with Fe anode-cathodic membrane. Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 672, p. 121417, 2023. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S037673882300073X.

YUAN, L. M. et al. Performance of an innovative step-feed An-M(A/O)-MBR process for nutrients removal. Desalination and Water Treatment, vol. 55, no 10, p. 2728–2733, 2015. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1944398624050306.

ZHANG, R. et al. Research progress of electrically-enhanced membrane bioreactor (EMBR) in pollutants removal and membrane fouling alleviation. Chemosphere, vol. 331, p. 138791, 2023. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0045653523010585.

ZHOU, X. et al. Comparative Analysis of Bacterial Information of Biofilms and Activated Sludge in Full-Scale MBBR-IFAS Systems. Microorganisms, vol. 12, no 6, p. 1121, 2024. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/12/6/1121.

Publicado

21-08-2026

Edição

Seção

Avaliação e mitigação de impactos ambientais

Como Citar

LEAL, Renata de Arcega; DALALIBERA, Amanda; BATTISTELLI, André Aguiar; BELLI, Tiago José; NAGEL-HASSEMER, Maria Eliza; TOCHETTO, Gabriel. Phosphorus removal in membrane bioreactor systems: a systematic review of operational parameters and configurations. Revista Gestão & Sustentabilidade, Brasil, v. 8, n. 1, p. e15643, 2026. DOI: 10.36661/2596-142X.2026v8n1.15643. Disponível em: https://periodicos.uffs.edu.br/index.php/RGES/article/view/15643. Acesso em: 28 ago. 2026.